<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI on Radical Optimist</title><link>https://radoptimist.org/en/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in AI on Radical Optimist</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://radoptimist.org/en/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI’s Efficiency Trap: When Productivity Destroys Demand</title><link>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-efficiency-trap/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-efficiency-trap/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>This is the second piece in a series. The first,
&lt;a href="https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-marx-was-right/">Marx Was Right About AI&lt;/a>, examined the leverage knowledge
workers hold over AI deployment — and why mission-driven organizations will capture
the productivity gains that extractive ones cannot. This piece operates at a different
scale: not the firm, but the monetary system. Not the leverage window, but what comes
after it closes. The third piece,
&lt;a href="https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-robustness-imperative/">The Robustness Imperative&lt;/a>, asks what kind of AI
infrastructure serves workers, organizations, and states — rather than extracting
from them.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Marx Was Right About AI</title><link>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-marx-was-right/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-marx-was-right/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>This is the first piece in a series. The second,
&lt;a href="https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-efficiency-trap/">The Efficiency Trap&lt;/a>, examines what happens to the monetary
system when the displacement described here runs to completion. The third,
&lt;a href="https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-robustness-imperative/">The Robustness Imperative&lt;/a>, asks what kind of AI
infrastructure serves workers, organizations, and states — rather than extracting
from them.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>For two centuries, the story of automation has followed a simple script. Capital
invests in machines. Workers are displaced. The productivity gain flows upward. Repeat.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>When Doing Stopped Being Learning</title><link>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/when-doing-stopped-being-learning/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/when-doing-stopped-being-learning/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;What I cannot create, I do not understand.&amp;rdquo; — Richard Feynman&lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>&lt;em>In the age of AI, every knowledge worker faces the same hidden trade-off: use the tool to produce, or use the tool to understand. You cannot fully do both. How you arbitrage that tension defines what you become.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;h2 id="i-when-doing-was-learning">I. When doing was learning&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Before AI, the coupling was tight. To ship software, you had to understand it. There was no shortcut. Writing the code &lt;em>was&lt;/em> the learning. Debugging &lt;em>was&lt;/em> the understanding. The act of production and the act of comprehension were the same act.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Fast Track to Incompetence</title><link>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-peters-principle/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://radoptimist.org/en/post/ai-peters-principle/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>AI, the Peter&amp;rsquo;s Principle, and the rise of the Senior Operator&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;h2 id="i-the-principle-accelerated">I. The principle, accelerated&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>In 1969, Laurence J. Peter observed that in any hierarchy, people rise until they reach their level of incompetence — promoted based on past performance until they land in a role their skills can&amp;rsquo;t support. [1] The ceiling was always there. It just took years to find.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>AI has changed the timeline. As a capability amplifier — not a capability builder — it makes you faster and more productive at tasks you already understand. The ceiling stays exactly where it was. The elevator just got faster.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>